Sunday, July 11, 2010
Thursday, July 1, 2010
Ligonier Ministries: Understanding the Cross by R. C. Sproul
What really happened on the cross? Was the death of Jesus a human tragedy whereby a good man was brutally and unfairly slain? Was His death an example of faith, obedience, and self-sacrifice? Was it a ransom paid to the Devil? A victory over the Devil? A manifestation of moral influence?
Was the cross an atonement? Did it involve expiation and propitiation for sin? Was it a supernatural act done to satisfy the wrath and justice of God? Each of these individually and several in combination have been set forth as the real meaning of Christ’s death.
How we understand the cross of Jesus in large part is determined by our view of the Bible. If we view the Bible as a primitive, pre-scientific expression of human religion, we will be inclined toward a purely natural view of the death of Jesus. It will represent at best an example of a heroic human act of self-sacrifice. Jesus is the existential hero of self-giving.
If we take the popular so-called neoorthodox view of Scripture, we will take a different approach to the cross. The neoorthodox view of the Bible denies that the Bible gives us propositional revelation. Rather, the Bible is seen as a witness to revelation that takes place in events.
To divide event revelation from propositional revelation is to leave us with a story without an interpretation. The Bible teaches that there was a crucial event, the event of the cross. Jesus of Nazareth was crucified. The significance of that death was not agreed upon by those who were a party to it or spectators of it. For the Sanhedrin, it was an act of expediency. It was necessary for Jesus to die, lest the Jews experience the wrath of the Romans. Likewise from Pilate’s vantage point, it was a matter of expediency for him to satisfy the demand of a raging mob. The thief on the cross saw it as an expression of injustice.
Coram Deo: How do you view the death of Jesus on the cross? What do you believe really happened at the cross? How does it affect you?
Colossians 1:19–20: “For it pleased the Father that in Him all the fullness should dwell, and by Him to reconcile all things to Himself, by Him, whether things on earth or things in heaven, having made peace through the blood of His cross.”
Colossians 2:13–14: “And you, being dead in you trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, He has made alive together with Him, having forgiven you all trespasses, having wiped out the handwriting of requirements that was against us, which was contrary to us. And He has taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross.”
1 Corinthians 1:17–18: “For Christ did not send me to baptize, but to preach the gospel, not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of no effect. For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.”
Source - http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=257366914390&comments&ref=mf
Was the cross an atonement? Did it involve expiation and propitiation for sin? Was it a supernatural act done to satisfy the wrath and justice of God? Each of these individually and several in combination have been set forth as the real meaning of Christ’s death.
How we understand the cross of Jesus in large part is determined by our view of the Bible. If we view the Bible as a primitive, pre-scientific expression of human religion, we will be inclined toward a purely natural view of the death of Jesus. It will represent at best an example of a heroic human act of self-sacrifice. Jesus is the existential hero of self-giving.
If we take the popular so-called neoorthodox view of Scripture, we will take a different approach to the cross. The neoorthodox view of the Bible denies that the Bible gives us propositional revelation. Rather, the Bible is seen as a witness to revelation that takes place in events.
To divide event revelation from propositional revelation is to leave us with a story without an interpretation. The Bible teaches that there was a crucial event, the event of the cross. Jesus of Nazareth was crucified. The significance of that death was not agreed upon by those who were a party to it or spectators of it. For the Sanhedrin, it was an act of expediency. It was necessary for Jesus to die, lest the Jews experience the wrath of the Romans. Likewise from Pilate’s vantage point, it was a matter of expediency for him to satisfy the demand of a raging mob. The thief on the cross saw it as an expression of injustice.
Coram Deo: How do you view the death of Jesus on the cross? What do you believe really happened at the cross? How does it affect you?
Colossians 1:19–20: “For it pleased the Father that in Him all the fullness should dwell, and by Him to reconcile all things to Himself, by Him, whether things on earth or things in heaven, having made peace through the blood of His cross.”
Colossians 2:13–14: “And you, being dead in you trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, He has made alive together with Him, having forgiven you all trespasses, having wiped out the handwriting of requirements that was against us, which was contrary to us. And He has taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross.”
1 Corinthians 1:17–18: “For Christ did not send me to baptize, but to preach the gospel, not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of no effect. For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.”
Source - http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=257366914390&comments&ref=mf
Christian apologetics
Check out the following site : (Christian apologetics & research ministry)
Check out the lecture : Law of Non-contradiction by R. C. Sproul
It looks like logic is falling apart in Christian community.
What we need to do is to recover the logical thinking in Christianity.
The Faith and reason radio 1/14/2010 - source : http://www.ustream.tv/channel/carmorg
Online video chat by Ustream
Check out the lecture : Law of Non-contradiction by R. C. Sproul
It looks like logic is falling apart in Christian community.
What we need to do is to recover the logical thinking in Christianity.
The Faith and reason radio 1/14/2010 - source : http://www.ustream.tv/channel/carmorg
Online video chat by Ustream
R. C. Sproul : The Law of Causality
Check out this lecture by R.C. Sproul: http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=11110204030
R. C. Sproul's philosophical argument about the cause and the effect.
Every effect has a cause. However, not everything has a cause.
God has no cause. He is a self-existing being.
R. C. Sproul's philosophical argument about the cause and the effect.
Every effect has a cause. However, not everything has a cause.
God has no cause. He is a self-existing being.
Does God exist? (CARM Debate 2008)
If you want to continue to watch the video please go to the following link :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hEdY9E6oSc
You will be able to find series of video that follow this in the related video at the right panel of youtube site.
Thanks
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)